Shopping Cart (0) items Sign In

Construction Claims Monthly - Devoted exclusively to the problems of construction contracting since 1963

‹ Prev article: 
 

Surety Bonds Are A One-Way Street, Promises Are Not Reciprocal

Monday, December 03, 2018 02:25 pm

 

Bonds

Hunt Constr. Grp., Inc. v. Cobb Mech. Contrs., Inc., 2018 U.S. Dist. W.D. Tex. Lexis 179564 (October 18, 2018)

A surety attempted to sue the beneficiary of a construction bond it issued. But the court ruled that that bond promises are not reciprocal. In other words, the beneficiary owed no obligation to the surety under the bond.

General contractor Hunt Construction Group, Inc. (Hunt) entered into a mechanical subcontract with Cobb Mechanical Contractors (Cobb) for work on a Fairmont Austin Hotel construction project in Texas. In July 2016, Hunt issued a series of default notices to Cobb and subsequently terminated the subcontract for the project's podium work on November 18, 2016.

Hunt immediately notified Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. (Liberty), the bond surety for Cobb's project performance, of the termination. Hunt informed Liberty that it intended to hire another sub to perform the remainder of Cobb's obligations and correct the defective work on the podium. On January 31, 2017, after several months of "investigation and review of Hunt's claim," Liberty formally den [...]

 
› Next article: 
 
Sign up now for Construction Claims Monthly Online! Your own virtual help desk of must-have techniques, tutorials, and how-to articles.
 
Join Now Construction Claims Monthly! Close