Shopping Cart (0) items Sign In

Construction Claims Monthly - Devoted exclusively to the problems of construction contracting since 1963


Correction: 'Twisted' No-Damages Clause Shields Owner If Contractor Takes It To Court An

Wednesday, July 07, 2010 04:33 am


This Editor's Note should have accompanied "Contractor Lost $250,000 By Assuming A Condition Precedent To Payment Didn't Apply," CCM Vol. 32, No. 6, p. 45:


The contract in the case -- Boro Construction, Inc. v. Ridley School [...]

› Next article: 
Sign up now for Construction Claims Monthly Online! Your own virtual help desk of must-have techniques, tutorials, and how-to articles.
Join Now Construction Claims Monthly! Close