Shopping Cart (0) items Sign In

Construction Claims Monthly - Devoted exclusively to the problems of construction contracting since 1963

‹ Prev article: 
 

Contractor Did Not Sign Off Under Duress Changes-directed; Payment-progress

Tuesday, December 02, 2003 06:05 pm

 
Contractor Did Not Sign Off Under Duress Changes-directed; Payment-progress

The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals has ruled that a contracting officer's statement that he could not pay for extra work that was not included in contract modifications was not a threat to withhold progress payments. The contractor did not [...]

 
› Next article: 
 
Sign up now for Construction Claims Monthly Online! Your own virtual help desk of must-have techniques, tutorials, and how-to articles.
 
Join Now Construction Claims Monthly! Close