Shopping Cart (0) items Sign In

Construction Claims Monthly - Devoted exclusively to the problems of construction contracting since 1963

‹ Prev article: 
 

Mobilization Recovery Based On Actual Cost Termination-convenience; Overhead

Tuesday, September 02, 2003 05:23 pm

 
Mobilization Recovery Based On Actual Cost Termination-convenience; Overhead

The Alaska Supreme Court has ruled that in a termination for convenience situation, a contractor's recovery for mobilization should be determined by actual cost, not the bid price. And home office expenses were spread over the entire calendar year, not just the construction season.

The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities awarded a contract to Quality Asphalt Paving, Inc. to widen the Chena Hot Springs Road. After the Department issued a notice to proceed, it became concerned that a buried utility cable created a spatial conflict with [...]

 
› Next article: 
 
Sign up now for Construction Claims Monthly Online! Your own virtual help desk of must-have techniques, tutorials, and how-to articles.
 
Join Now Construction Claims Monthly! Close