Construction Claims Monthly - Devoted exclusively to the problems of construction contracting since 1963

Updates from Current Issue
Lack Of Written Notice Was Not An Absolute Bar To Sub$2M Claim Denied Where Contractor Bore Price Fluctuation RiskIt's No Tort To Breach A Contract - No Matter How Cruel The SuretySub-Owner Settlement Didn't Impede Contractor's Indemnity ClaimGovt. Misrepresentation Voids Accord & Satisfaction - If You Can Prove ItLine Item Price Omission Was Not An Immaterial DefectSpearin Saved Design/Builder From Liability For Gabion Wall Failure

Construction Claims Monthly Special Reports

From the editors of Construction Claims Monthly come several indispensible reports designed to help you navigate the legal pitfalls of construction contracting.

Interested in purchasing a CCM Special Report? Please contact us at 1-800-223-8720 or custserv@constructionclaimsmonthly.org. All reports are delivered instantly via email as a PDF. Print copies are also available.

  • Drafting Provisions for Delay Damages(2012; 22 pages)
    Drafting Provisions for Delay DamagesWhile delays on complex construction projects are often inevitable, delays in recovering damages can be avoided. This special report provides the legal insights and current court precedents that will help you draft sound delay damages provisions—and successfully manage delay and disruption claims. We will help you understand the enforceability and exceptions of the common no-damages-for-delay clause, giving you the keys to a swift legal course of action.
    Price: Print($149) - e-Book($99)
  • Taking Direct Action Against Design Negligence
    Taking Direct Action Against Design NegligenceSpotlight On Section 522 Of The Restatement (Second) Of Torts (2012) When suing for economic damages thanks to a disappointing project outcome, you must sue someone you have a contract with. That's the bare bones of the economic loss rule, and it often prevents contractors from going after project architects for professional negligence. However, by relying on Section 522 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, some states have opened up a loophole. This special report illustrates the varied applications of the exception to the economic loss doctrine. The exception can be narrow, but knowing your options can make a big difference to your chances at cash recovery.
    Price: Print($149) - e-Book($99)
  • The Differing Site Conditions Clause: Its Range And Restrictions (2013; 60 pages)
    The Differing Site Conditions Clause: Its Range And RestrictionsA differing site conditions clause is not an iron-clad protection for contractors. To deflect liability, owners frequently include disclaimers that the site data provided are not warranted for accuracy and should not be relied upon during project performance. As a result, site condition claims often end up in litigation, leaving courts to decide which contract provision rules. Courts have ruled both ways on the enforceability of site data disclaimers. But you don't have to be left guessing as to your own chances. Get insider analysis of precedent in the Construction Claims Monthly special report, The Differing Site Conditions Clause: Its Range And Restrictions
    Price: Print($149) - e-Book($99)
  • Court Confirms Limit On Eichleay: Project Must Have Begun(2012; 2 pages)
    Court Confirms Limit On Eichleay: Project Must Have BegunIf you were on the job longer than planned, you're likely to reach for Eichleay's help in recovering extended home overhead. But beware. A federal case has put new limits on the Eichleay Formula and how you can calculate costs associated with work stoppages. The Redland Co. v. United States, 2011 Ct. Fed. Cl. No. 08-606C is an industry changer. Learn how this important case will impact your business decisions, your claims, and your chances in court. Don't be left behind when state courts begin adopting this decision.
    Price: e-Book($15)