Construction Claims Monthly - Devoted exclusively to the problems of construction contracting since 1963

Updates from Current Issue
WHO’S TO BLAME: CONTRACTOR LIABILITY WHERE THE FACT FINDER CAN’T APPORTION FAULTLEAD CONTAMINATION IS A TYPE II DIFFERING CONDITION, GOVT. TO FOOT DISPOSAL BILLSUB’S $1.2 MILLION EXTRA WORK CLAIM COULDN’T CLEAR WRITTEN CONSENT HURDLECONTRACTOR HAD DUTY TO DISCLOSE NEGOTIATIONS THAT OUSTED SUB FROM PROJECTPARTIES’ CONTRACT DID NOT CONTAIN A FORUM-SELECTION CLAUSEFEDERAL GOVT. WAS JUST A ‘NOMINAL’ PARTY TO SUB’S MILLER ACT SUITBIDDER’S DESIGN PROPOSAL DEMONSTRATED ‘SOME RISK OF FAILURE’

Library - Construction Claims Monthly

Find out what twists and turns the construction claims world is taking. Browse the latest issue of Construction Claims Monthly to stay on top of recent verdicts, smart contracting strategies and common claims missteps:

Browse Library:
2013 |  2012 |  2011 |  2010 |  2009 |  2008 |  2007 |  2006 |  2005 |  2004 |  2003 |  2002 |  2001 |  2000 |  1999 |  1998 |  1997 |  1996 | 
SEARCH FROM   TO   
 
Searched Library for year - 2007
 
Construction Claims Monthly 2007 Annual Index
 
November 2007 - Volume 29 Number 11
 
October 2007 - Volume 29 Number 10
 
September 2007 - Volume 29 Number 9
 
August 2007 - Volume 29 Number 8
 
July 2007 - Volume 29 Number 7
 
June 2007 - Volume 29 Number 6
 
May 2007 - Volume 29 Number 5
 
April 2007 - Volume 29 Number 4
 
March 2007 - Volume 29 Number 3
 
February 2007 - Volume 29 Number 2
 
January 2007 - Volume 29 Number 1
 
Browse Library:
2013 |  2012 |  2011 |  2010 |  2009 |  2008 |  2007 |  2006 |  2005 |  2004 |  2003 |  2002 |  2001 |  2000 |  1999 |  1998 |  1997 |  1996 | 
SEARCH FROM   TO